When answering a question about previous compensation history, what detail provides a potentially higher anchor point?
Answer
Providing the total compensation package (base plus bonuses, stock, etc.) rather than just the base salary.
If forced to disclose past earnings, providing details about the entire package, including variable components like bonuses or stock, offers a more comprehensive and potentially higher number to anchor against, rather than just the base salary.
#Videos
“What Are Your Salary Expectations?” How to Answer & Not Get ...
Related Questions
What is the primary logic for delaying the disclosure of a concrete salary number?What is a risk if a candidate states an expectation slightly higher than the budget, even if it is market rate?What concept describes the tendency for the first stated salary figure to become the reference point for the negotiation?What is an effective tactical response when wanting to defer the compensation discussion in an early interview?When committing to figures, why is offering a researched range generally preferred over stating a single precise number?What essential elements must compensation research factor in besides the job title itself?If a candidate unintentionally sets their salary expectation too low during initial disclosure, what is the main consequence?A strong compensation answer should primarily link expectations to which two core elements?When researching compensation, what components constitute the 'total compensation package'?If an interviewer states a budgeted salary range lower than the candidate anticipated, what strategic move should the candidate employ?When answering a question about previous compensation history, what detail provides a potentially higher anchor point?