What factor is identified as making the ambiguity of silence (ghosting) more detrimental than an explicit rejection?
Answer
It leaves the candidate perpetually in limbo
An explicit rejection provides closure, allowing the applicant to redirect energy, whereas silence following an interview leaves the candidate uncertain about their standing, exacerbating anxiety.
Related Questions
What factors influence the range of what job seekers consider a 'normal' rejection count?What does the Career Toolkit suggest getting rejected consistently *after* the first interview might signal?What metric is useful for evaluating how effectively an application moves past initial screening filters?What is the psychological impact suggested to be common among job seekers due to receiving negative responses?What does receiving zero initial screening calls after submitting 20 applications suggest about the job search strategy?What specific advice is given regarding setting goals to manage the psychological toll proactively?Why does a rejection sting more severely after investing significant personal time in multiple interview rounds?What factor is identified as making the ambiguity of silence (ghosting) more detrimental than an explicit rejection?What must necessarily be high when the acceptance rate for desirable positions is low?What makes the job search emotionally draining when the 'no' is internalized incorrectly?What does the text suggest is the definition of a 'successful' search, regardless of the sheer number of 'no's received?