What are the three C's in an interview?

The concept of the "Three C's" in interviewing often appears as a shorthand for interview success, yet its precise meaning can shift dramatically depending on whose perspective you adopt—the job candidate or the hiring manager. ^[3][5] It is not a single, universally defined model but rather a collection of powerful frameworks used to distill the complex process of hiring down to its most critical elements. ^[3] For job seekers, understanding which set of Three C's is being discussed—whether it pertains to the structure of their answers or the core attributes the employer seeks—is the first step toward a winning performance. ^[4]

# Pillars of Fit

For employers, the primary goal during candidate evaluation is predicting future success, often by assessing deep-seated qualities. One highly referenced model centers on what a successful hire fundamentally is: Character, Competence, and Chemistry. ^[3][6] This trifecta is considered an essential evaluation framework by some industry leaders, as a bad hire can cost an organization significantly in productivity loss and momentum. ^[3]

# Character

Character addresses the core trustworthiness and moral fiber of an applicant. ^[3][7] This is about sincerity and whether a person is the same when nobody important is watching. ^[3] An employee with exceptional skill who ultimately proves to have poor character—perhaps through dishonesty or mistreating colleagues—will eventually destroy the good they initially brought to the table. ^[3] To gauge this, interviewers often probe past professional or personal hardships, looking for evidence of humility, honesty, and demonstrated growth stemming from those challenging experiences. ^[3] A candidate who can clearly articulate lessons learned from past failures signals a reliable foundation. ^[7]

# Competence

Competence is straightforward: can the person actually perform the job required?^[3][7] While many candidates may possess admirable character, an organization needs individuals who can get the required tasks done effectively. ^[3] This element assesses the candidate’s foundational ability and their capacity to learn the specifics of the new environment quickly. ^[7] Competence is not just about having skills; it is about having the right skills to meet the demands of the role. ^[3] In some interviewing styles, this is tested by having the candidate prove their abilities by engaging in a real work assignment during the interview process. ^[3]

# Chemistry

Chemistry, sometimes called compatibility, moves beyond individual attributes to focus on how the person integrates with the existing group dynamic. ^[3][6] It is less about simply getting along and more about whether the team performs better because the new person is present. ^[3] Do they collaborate freely, share credit, and raise the overall team morale?^[3] The SERO Group notes that while a candidate might meet minimum technical requirements, compatibility determines if they can work effectively alone or as part of a team, and whether they possess the initiative and work ethic to take ownership. ^[7] Reference checks that focus on the impact of the candidate's departure from past roles can provide insight into their chemistry with former teams. ^[3]

# Response Structure

A separate, but equally common, interpretation of the Three C's focuses not on who the candidate is, but how they communicate their value during the interview. This set is Concise, Compelling, and Concrete. ^[4] This approach aims to streamline responses, making the candidate memorable and easy to evaluate, especially for common behavioral or situational questions where the STAR method might not perfectly apply. ^[4]

# Concise

Being concise means delivering your message succinctly without rambling or wasting the interviewer's limited time. ^[4] In high-stakes situations, nervousness can lead to overly long, disorganized answers. The key strategy here is boiling down any response to two or three primary, impactful points. ^[4] This structure shows command of the subject matter and demonstrates effective communication skills, signaling that the candidate respects the interviewer’s schedule. ^[4]

# Compelling

A compelling response captures attention and conveys genuine enthusiasm for the role and the company. ^[4] This requires preparation; a candidate must link their passion for their field to the organization’s specific mission, challenges, or recent successes. Generic statements about being "excited" are ineffective. Instead, the answer should weave in specific details gleaned from research—mentioning an innovative company approach or a specific team goal they are eager to contribute toward. ^[4]

# Concrete

Concrete answers provide tangible proof of the claims made during the interview. ^[4] While many candidates offer vague statements about their abilities, concrete responses back up those claims with specific, prepared work examples—their personal success stories. ^[4] For instance, when asked about handling stress, relating a story about breaking down a tight deadline project into manageable tasks, delegating based on team strengths, and hitting the target validates the claim far better than a simple definition of stress management. ^[4] These specific examples make it simple for the interviewer to assess the candidate’s actual impact. ^[4]

What are three pros and three cons of remote work?

# Synthesis and Interviewer Projection

It becomes clear that these two candidate-focused models are deeply interconnected. A candidate who answers with responses that are Concrete about their past work immediately provides evidence of their Competence. ^[3][4] Similarly, clear, well-structured, Concise answers help build Credibility with the interviewer, even if the interviewer is using a different C-model for assessment. ^[5][4]

For interviewers, the goal shifts from evaluation to establishing trust and guiding the conversation. One essential interviewer framework involves projecting Credibility, Competence, and Confidence. ^[5]

# Credibility

Credibility is the foundation; it is built by being trustworthy and doing what you say you will do. ^[5] If an interviewer lacks credibility, expecting honesty from a candidate becomes illogical. ^[5] This quality is intrinsically linked to effective planning and ethical behavior during the interview itself. ^[5]

# Competence

The interviewer’s competence involves understanding the why behind their questions and techniques, not just following a script. ^[5] Training and knowing the theory—such as why rapport is necessary—equips the interviewer for confident execution. ^[5] This informed approach helps them recognize qualified candidates, even when they lack knowledge of every specific tool the company uses, by focusing on a strong learning foundation. ^[7]

# Confidence

Confidence, distinct from arrogance, grows directly from possessing both credibility and competence. ^[5] When an interviewer is well-prepared and operates from a position of integrity and knowledge, they can better adapt when the interview takes an unexpected turn. ^[5] Interestingly, some interviewers adopt an alternative set of projection C's: Confidence, Control, and Connection. Here, Control means guiding the conversation intentionally, while Connection emphasizes making the candidate feel seen and heard, recognizing that candidates remember how they were made to feel.

To truly maximize interview results, job seekers should recognize that their performance must satisfy both evaluation standards. One actionable thought for job seekers preparing for a critical role is to structure every major answer around the Concise, Compelling, Concrete model to ensure clarity and impact, while simultaneously ensuring the content of those answers directly showcases their Character, Competence, and Chemistry. ^[3][4] For instance, when providing a Concrete example of a project success (Competence), one can choose a story that demonstrates high Character (like admitting a mistake and correcting it) and highlights team collaboration (Chemistry), all delivered in a Compelling narrative that is Concise. ^[4] By layering these two frameworks, a candidate ensures they are not only answering the question well but are also providing the specific evidence the hiring team is searching for. ^[5][7]

Ultimately, the "Three C's" serve as a memory aid, ensuring that whether you are the one being assessed or the one doing the assessing, you do not overlook the vital components of a successful professional match. ^[3][8] When interviewers fail to invest in training their teams to evaluate candidates against these core attributes, they risk making hiring mistakes that cost time and morale, confirming that the framework, in any of its variations, remains central to effective hiring. ^[3][8]