What is a direct positive consequence when organizations link performance management directly to individual growth objectives?
Answer
The process becomes more transparent and less subjective
When an employer formalizes the connection between the established performance management system and stated individual growth objectives, the ambiguity surrounding advancement diminishes significantly. This linkage clarifies the criteria for progression, whether it involves a title change or specialization. By articulating the required skills and achievements openly, the process moves away from subjectivity and favoritism toward a clear, understandable framework that mutually supports both the employee's personal development goals and the specific business needs of the company.
Related Questions
Besides accumulating experience and increasing skills, what is another core component defining career growth according to the general definition?What is the key conceptual difference between career growth and career development as outlined in the text?According to the comparison table, what is the primary focus area encapsulated by Horizontal Growth?What is the typical success metric example provided in the comparison table for Vertical Growth?Which tangible sign of progress is characterized by a reduction in the need for direct supervision?What is the name of the practical method suggested for tracking ownership during the Ownership Planning phase of career progression?In a growth phase, how does the focus shift for an employee compared to the earlier career focus primarily placed on execution?What does Intrinsic Growth primarily focus on, as detailed in the Growth Type comparison table?Why is relying passively on an employer to deliver a growth path rarely seen as leading to satisfaction for the employee?What is a direct positive consequence when organizations link performance management directly to individual growth objectives?