When justifying substantial reskilling budgets, what hidden costs should be calculated alongside direct training expenses?
Answer
Project delays from missing expertise and high recruitment fees.
Justification for learning investment involves quantifying the costs avoided by not training, such as delays in projects due to capability gaps or the high expense of external agency recruitment.
Related Questions
What is the typical modern measurement for the shelf life of many technical competencies?What is the primary engine driving the necessity for constant skill reassessment?As machines assume routine functions, what type of responsibilities remain for humans?What process involves teaching an employee skills to qualify for an entirely different role?Besides acquiring necessary skills, what strategic benefit does reskilling existing employees offer organizations?What concept describes the need to teach a seasoned professional interface-level skills for new technology, like prompt engineering?Why is hiring externally often viewed as a risky alternative to internal reskilling?What must a successful reskilling program begin with to ensure efficacy?When justifying substantial reskilling budgets, what hidden costs should be calculated alongside direct training expenses?What is the primary protection proactive reskilling offers an individual employee against market changes?Where does much essential reskilling happen outside of formal classroom settings?