What mechanism combats knowledge decay by requiring active participation from general readers?
Answer
Reporting factually incorrect or outdated articles immediately via the portal's feedback mechanism
An immediate feedback loop, where readers report issues, solidifies trust in the portal's reliability and is a key part of ongoing governance that combats knowledge decay.
Related Questions
What problem is a knowledge portal fundamentally designed to solve?What is the distinct objective of research-focused knowledge portals?What function does the portal's taxonomy dictate?Which search capability allows users to narrow initial results based on attributes like date or project ID?Which step in the contribution process is described as the most critical for future usability?According to the text, what happens to a previous version of a procedure when it is updated in the portal?What term is used to describe knowledge that exists in the system but cannot be reliably found or used by others?Which action helps users significantly broaden or narrow initial search results by finding variations of a term?Why is access control particularly important for documenting discoveries in a research knowledge portal?What is the primary goal of minimizing the time users spend searching within the portal?What mechanism combats knowledge decay by requiring active participation from general readers?