Which factor signals that leaving immediately, potentially without a backup plan, might be necessary due to acute health concerns?
Answer
Consistent, documented evidence of physical or psychological decline caused by the job
When health is actively and measurably sabotaged by the work environment, health must take precedence, making the cost of staying exceed the cost of temporary unemployment.
Related Questions
What is the crucial first step when assessing job dissatisfaction?If the average of four misery metrics consistently surpasses what threshold, does it strongly suggest the environment is detrimental?What is the primary health concern linked to chronic job dissatisfaction?What term is used to describe being trapped in a job due to compensation or vesting schedules that are too lucrative to leave?What career repercussion is described as a 'silent killer' in professional development?Which scenario provides a strong, pragmatic argument for choosing to stay in a miserable job?What is a significant advantage of searching for a new role while remaining employed?According to Exit Planning guidelines, what is the recommended minimum savings buffer required to cover essential expenses for leaving without a new role?What self-check question helps distinguish between hating the job and hating the general concept of working or routine?Which factor signals that leaving immediately, potentially without a backup plan, might be necessary due to acute health concerns?If identifying the source of dissatisfaction reveals the issue is a temporary organizational crunch, what action might be rewarded?