What specific metric might a Research Impact Analyst determine is more appropriate than a raw count for certain funding areas?
Answer
Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI)
A Research Impact Analyst may engage in significant methodological design, deciding if metrics like the Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) are more suitable than raw citation counts for evaluating impact within a specific funding area.
#Videos
The Role of Bibliometrics in Library and Information Research and ...
Related Questions
What discipline does bibliometrics primarily focus on analyzing?What do expert bibliometricians understand about metrics like citation counts?What specific titles are common for library specialists offering research evaluation support?What type of decisions do Policy Analysts often aid senior leadership in making?What programming skills are often necessitated for bibliometricians in industry settings dealing with unstructured datasets?How does the advisory focus of a Policy Analyst differ from that of a library specialist?Compared to internal university staff who describe existing output, what task might external consultants be tasked with?Besides traditional citation counts, what novel indicators do external/industry roles often look toward?How has the modern subject bibliographer evolved their collection development process?What specific metric might a Research Impact Analyst determine is more appropriate than a raw count for certain funding areas?