What distinction is made between process metrics and outcome metrics when assessing intrinsic success?
Answer
Process metrics are leading indicators that predict future satisfaction, whereas outcome metrics are lagging indicators judging past performance
Process metrics, such as weekly learning or enjoyment of team meetings, are leading indicators, suggesting future success. Outcome metrics, like a promotion, are lagging indicators assessing performance that has already occurred.
Related Questions
What is the current trend defining success in a career?What danger can high compensation or a prestigious job title present in measuring career success?What constitutes a common proxy for success based on historical external benchmarks?According to the text, what intrinsic factor can make a high-paying role feel like a failure?When assessing job alignment, what must be minimized to achieve success in that context?What distinction is made between process metrics and outcome metrics when assessing intrinsic success?How should abstract desires like 'work-life balance' be handled to measure progress effectively?Which example is provided for tracking concrete evidence of intellectual progress in a career?What is the primary suggested method for quantifying qualitative aspects of career satisfaction over time?What is the potential consequence of rigidly adhering to a definition of success established a decade earlier?