In the Value-Fit Score example, why was the role scoring 9, 8, and 3 potentially problematic?
Answer
The score of 3 indicates a violation of a key non-negotiable value, suggesting high friction potential.
Even though the total score was 20, the score of 3 suggests an active violation of a key non-negotiable value, indicating a higher potential for long-term friction than a role with more consistent, albeit lower, satisfaction.
Related Questions
What role do professional values primarily play in a career?What often results when professional values are not clearly defined?Which of the following is explicitly listed as an example of a core professional value?How does valuing work-life balance aid in career direction?How do professional values contribute to navigation resilience?According to the text, what role do professional values play in relation to passion and purpose?What analytical technique helps reveal a neglected core value?What is the primary consequence of dissonance between an organization's espoused values and practiced values?In the Value-Fit Score example, why was the role scoring 9, 8, and 3 potentially problematic?What ultimately drives sustained high performance in a career?