How does the internal raise structure often contribute to salary erosion compared to market reality?
Answer
Internal raises are often incremental (like 3%) and fail to match market value increases (like 8%)
Internal raise structures tend to favor company budgets, meaning standard incremental raises may not compensate for larger market value increases for the same skillset, leading to a real-terms pay cut relative to worth outside the organization.
Related Questions
What quantifiable downside is associated with excessive tenure at one company?What specific term is used to describe the psychological difficulty of leaving a familiar job environment?According to the text regarding skill atrophy, what causes the incentive to learn new methodologies to diminish?What time benchmark on a mental 'Skill Decay Scorecard' signals that a professional's learning curve has flattened?What specific concern might external reviewers have regarding a candidate with a very long tenure in a single role?How does the internal raise structure often contribute to salary erosion compared to market reality?If an employee occupies the same seat with the same responsibilities for ten years, how does external perception shift?What is presented as a genuine advantage of long-term employment?What is the primary danger that keeps many people remaining at a job past their prime growth phase?When career velocity slows, what is the best initial tactical adjustment suggested before outright resignation?