During periods like the Great Resignation, why were hiring managers often compelled to hire candidates with frequent job changes?
Answer
Those candidates possessed the specific skills the hiring managers urgently needed
Despite a preference for stability, modern realities forced hiring managers to prioritize candidates who had moved frequently if they possessed the specialized skills required to fill critical, immediate needs.
Related Questions
What is the primary historical concern employers cite regarding candidates with numerous short job stints?What is often cited as the most apparent financial benefit of frequently changing jobs?In which environments might showing a breadth of experience across different technologies be viewed as a positive indicator?What do Gen Z workers typically prioritize over tenure alone when viewing a job?What specific risk is signaled when a résumé shows a consistent pattern of leaving jobs every six to twelve months?What is the core distinction that separates a successful 'career climber' from a 'flaky employee'?What is the recommended minimum tenure an individual should aim for in a role to establish a strong professional achievement?What non-compensation benefit does frequent job movement offer for skill development?What reason, other than performance issues, do self-described 'serial job hoppers' often give for leaving previous roles?During periods like the Great Resignation, why were hiring managers often compelled to hire candidates with frequent job changes?