According to the text regarding the separation of powers, who is responsible for scoring the performance in the game?
Answer
The Judges.
Successful implementation relies on a separation of powers where the Designer proposes the game, the Administrator runs the game, and the Judges score the performance presented by the solvers.
Related Questions
What is the primary intellectual task of the Design Architect?If the architect designs the blueprint, what role manages the construction site day-to-day?What balance must the Prize Challenge Statement strike?What subtle but vital function does the Prize Administrator handle regarding participant inquiries?Before judging, what role do Technical Advisors play regarding proposed metrics?What is the strict role of the Judging Panel?Which responsibility belongs primarily to the Steering Committee or Governance Board?What is the primary goal of the Communications and Outreach Team regarding solver recruitment?What is the primary concern for the Legal Team in challenge prize setup?What function is explicitly reserved for the Finance Team, distinct from the Prize Administrator?According to the text regarding the separation of powers, who is responsible for scoring the performance in the game?