Why can't managers take tips?

The confusion surrounding whether a restaurant manager can accept or keep tips is pervasive across the service industry, often leading to awkward confrontations or, worse, illegal pay practices. At the heart of this issue isn't a matter of restaurant policy or tradition, but rather federal wage and hour law, specifically the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). ^[3] Generally speaking, the answer is a firm no, but the reasoning ties directly into the manager’s function and their legal standing as an agent of the employer. ^[8]

# Defining the Role

The critical distinction in tip legality rests on whether an employee is considered an "employer" or a "supervisor" under the law. ^[7] The FLSA governs minimum wage, overtime, and tip credit provisions. While employees who customarily and regularly receive tips (tipped employees) have specific rules applied to them regarding their base pay, managers and supervisors fall into a separate category that prohibits them from sharing in those tips. ^[3]

When a manager accepts a tip, they are essentially taking money that should legally go to the non-tipped employees who directly provided the service, or they are retaining funds that should be considered part of the employer's revenue, depending on the specific structure. ^[8] This prohibition exists because managers are viewed as acting in the employer's interest. If they are treated as employees for the purpose of receiving tips, they cannot simultaneously function as the employer's representative when it comes to paying service staff.

The Department of Labor (DOL) has been clear: managers and supervisors cannot participate in tip pooling arrangements or directly accept tips intended for service staff. ^[8] This stance reinforces the boundary between ownership/management and the standard labor force. In many practical settings, this means anyone with the authority to hire, fire, discipline, or set schedules is barred from the tip jar. ^[4]

# Supervisor Status

The key factor determining a manager’s ineligibility for tips isn't their job title on a business card, but the duties they perform. ^[4] If an individual performs managerial or supervisory duties on a regular basis, they are disqualified from receiving employee tips—even if they occasionally jump in to bus tables or pour drinks to help out during a rush. ^[8]

The DOL has provided guidance on this "two hats" scenario, essentially stating that an employee who spends a significant amount of time on supervisory tasks cannot be treated as a regular tipped employee for tip-sharing purposes. ^[8] The focus is on whether the individual acts as the employer's agent. An agent is someone who has the authority to manage, supervise, or direct the work of others. ^[4]

Consider this breakdown based on primary function, which highlights why a title alone is insufficient:

It is insightful to recognize that the law focuses on control. If a manager has the authority to impact another employee’s pay, hours, or continued employment, that relationship dictates their inability to share in the tips earned by the controlled staff. ^[9] This prevents a situation where the employer, through their representative, skims from the service staff's legitimately earned gratuities.

Are managers allowed to be tipped?

# State Law Nuances

While the FLSA provides the federal floor for these rules, specific states can—and often do—impose stricter standards that further protect employee tips. This means that even if a practice skirts the edge of federal regulation, it might still be illegal locally. ^[4]

For example, California’s Division of Industrial Relations (DIR) has specific rules concerning gratuities. In California, tips are considered the sole property of the employee who received them. ^[4] The law explicitly states that employers, managers, and supervisors cannot keep any portion of an employee’s tips, regardless of whether the manager is subject to a tip pool or not. ^[4] This position is often much clearer and more restrictive than federal interpretations, leaving little room for argument regarding managerial participation. Similarly, local jurisdictions, such as Seattle, have rules that employees often cite to back up their stance against managers taking gratuities. ^[5]

If a manager is employed in a state with robust tip protection laws, the risk of non-compliance for the business owner increases significantly. It's not just about the minimum wage implication under the FLSA; state laws often carry separate, and sometimes harsher, civil penalties for illegal retention of tips. ^[4]

# Tip Pools and Managerial Participation

The restrictions become particularly pronounced when discussing tip pools. A tip pool is a system where employees agree to divide tips among themselves. ^[9] While pooling among employees (like servers, bussers, bartenders) is generally permissible under the FLSA if structured correctly, the inclusion of a manager or supervisor immediately invalidates the legality of that pool for the non-managerial participants. ^[9][3]

The DOL explicitly prohibits employers, including their agents like managers, from keeping any tips received by employees, including those pooled tips. ^[3] If a manager takes money from a tip pool, it’s treated the same as if the employer took it—it violates the FLSA because that money was intended for the service employees. ^[8]

This has a ripple effect. If a pool includes a manager, the employer might be deemed to have taken an illegal tip credit from all participating service staff, potentially making them liable for the full minimum wage for all hours worked by those employees, not just the tipped minimum wage. ^[9] This financial consequence serves as a significant deterrent for employers who might otherwise be tempted to allow managers to dip into the communal pot.

An often overlooked aspect for employers is the liability associated with allowing a manager to take tips, even if they are only keeping the tips left directly for them (e.g., a $20 left on the table specifically for the manager). Since the manager is the employer's agent, any tip accepted is technically a retention by the employer. ^[8] To avoid this, many establishments enforce a blanket policy: no one in a supervisory role touches any tip money related to customer gratuities, keeping the books clean and clear of any FLSA grey areas. ^[1]

What jobs exist in asset performance management?

# Analyzing Employee Perception and Workplace Culture

Beyond the strict legal interpretation, the prohibition on managers accepting tips has a profound impact on workplace dynamics and perceived fairness, which is often a key discussion point among industry workers. ^[1][5][6] For the service staff, tips represent direct compensation for excellent, often strenuous, work. When a manager who sets schedules, handles disciplinary actions, and evaluates performance takes a share of that money, it is frequently viewed as an abuse of power, regardless of the legal technicalities surrounding their supervisory status. ^[1][6]

From the staff’s perspective, the manager's role is inherently tied to the employer's structure, making any retention of service tips feel like wage theft, even if the specific state law might be ambiguous about a manager who only performs duties 5% of the time. ^[5] In many online discussions, employees express that they would rather an owner take the tip than a manager, perhaps because the owner’s role is clearer—they are the business entity—whereas the manager is seen as a direct peer turned overseer who is now profiting from their team's direct customer interactions. ^[6]

This cultural viewpoint often leads to preemptive policies even in jurisdictions where the law is less explicit, simply to maintain team morale. If a restaurant's policy states that managers cannot take tips, it establishes a clear line of authority and compensation that respects the earning structure of the front-line staff. When managers are observed taking tips, reports frequently surface online indicating staff turnover or complaints to agencies like the DOL. ^[1]

# Employer Liability and Best Practices

For the business owner, allowing a manager to accept tips is a significant gamble. If the manager takes tips intended for service staff, the employer is liable for the underpayment of the service staff's wages under the FLSA. ^[9] If the manager keeps tips left for themselves, the employer might still face scrutiny regarding whether that manager was truly exempt from overtime or if they were performing non-exempt duties while simultaneously taking a gratuity, which further complicates tax reporting and overtime compliance. ^[2]

A practical step an employer can take to ensure compliance is to clearly define the dual role exception. If a person must perform managerial duties but is expected to participate in service tasks (e.g., a small bar where the owner is rarely present), the employer needs to document the time spent in each capacity meticulously. However, as noted, the DOL’s guidance strongly suggests that if supervisory tasks are performed regularly, that person is an agent and cannot participate in the tip pool with non-supervisory employees. ^[8] The simplest, legally safest approach is often to treat all individuals with supervisory authority as ineligible for employee tips altogether. ^[4]

This is where an executive decision on compensation becomes necessary: instead of trying to fit a manager into a tipped employee structure, employers should compensate managers through a higher, fixed salary or an hourly wage structure that accounts for their non-tipped status, ensuring their income is derived from the business operations rather than customer gratuities intended for others. This clarity eliminates the manager's incentive and legal vulnerability regarding employee tips, safeguarding the business from potential wage and hour lawsuits that can be costly and time-consuming to defend, even if the initial retention was minimal. ^[2]

In essence, the inability of managers to take tips is a protective measure codified in wage law. It shields service workers from having their earnings diverted by those with authority over them, drawing a bright line between the management structure and the service personnel whose income relies heavily on customer generosity. ^[3][7] The manager's status as an agent of the employer automatically disqualifies them from participating in the gratuities meant for the rest of the team, regardless of how hard they work on the floor during a dinner rush. ^[8]