Where does the security assurance lie when using Hardware-Based Methods like Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)?
Answer
In the integrity of the specialized hardware architecture itself.
The security of TEEs relies on the physical security features of the processor, which create an isolated, encrypted enclave. The operating system and hypervisor cannot access the data or code within this running environment.
Related Questions
What fundamental conflict does Privacy-Preserving Computation primarily address?How does PPC fundamentally differ from traditional access controls regarding data processing?What is the key characteristic that enables Fully Homomorphic Encryption (FHE) to be used with an untrusted third party?What is a noted performance trade-off associated with Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC)?What is the primary mechanism utilized by statistical approaches like differential privacy?Where does the security assurance lie when using Hardware-Based Methods like Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs)?What is the core function of Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) in a data context?According to the interaction model heuristic, which technique favors a scenario where all parties must be present and active during computation?What is the explicit trade-off associated with using statistical noise methods for privacy?How can PPC protect a proprietary Machine Learning model from being reverse-engineered when used by a third party?When adopting cryptographic PPC methods, where is trust mathematically placed?