When expertise is lacking in a specialized area, what is the ethical path forward for a lawyer?
Answer
Gaining the necessary knowledge, associating with competent counsel, or declining the representation
When a matter demands expertise the lawyer lacks, the ethical options are to acquire that knowledge, work with competent co-counsel, or ethically decline to take on the case.
Related Questions
What is required for a lawyer's duty of competence besides academic knowledge?When expertise is lacking in a specialized area, what is the ethical path forward for a lawyer?What is specifically mentioned as a practical measure for demonstrating technological aptitude for lawyers?When does a conflict of interest exist regarding client representation?For in-house counsel, who constitutes the organization's client?Where is the lawyer's primary duty of candor demonstrated?How long does the duty of confidentiality typically extend after representation ends?What is a crucial requirement when handling client funds held in trust or escrow accounts?What constitutes an ethical breach regarding communication failures?Which activity constitutes the Unauthorized Practice of Law (UPL) for a paralegal?What is the primary concern regarding client interests when a lawyer moves between firms?What is the purpose of an internal 'ethical escalation ladder' for in-house counsel facing business pressure?