What is the ultimate consequence for organizations that fail to invest in continuous workforce adaptation through reskilling?
Answer
They risk creating internal silos of obsolescence, leading to systemic fragility
The failure to adapt the workforce continuously results in knowledge becoming siloed in outdated roles, making the organization brittle and unable to respond effectively to external pressures.
Related Questions
What is the primary focus of reskilling according to the provided text?What strategic purpose does upskilling primarily serve, distinct from reskilling?How might an internal reskilling program's time-to-competency compare to hiring an external expert for adjacent roles?How does prioritizing internal mobility through reskilling generally affect employee retention rates?Which costs associated with external hiring are substantially avoided when a company chooses to reskill internally?What time horizon should organizations use when assessing future needs to define required reskilling roles?Which learning component is noted as being insufficient on its own when training employees for substantially new areas?Why is recognizing and naming transferable skills crucial for a successful reskilling process?How should managers frame a reskilling opportunity to employees to foster motivation rather than defensiveness?What is the ultimate consequence for organizations that fail to invest in continuous workforce adaptation through reskilling?