What is suggested as a common yardstick for assessing if one's progression rate is adequate?
Answer
Checking if a promotion or significant title change has occurred every three to five years
Career commentators suggest using progression rate as a yardstick; if an individual has not experienced a promotion or a significant title change within three to five years, they should proactively reassess their situation.
Related Questions
What is a common concern recruiters have regarding an employee who spent a decade or more in the exact same role?What does the phenomenon known as 'golden handcuffs' primarily describe?Historically, how much of a salary bump can jumping companies yield compared to incremental internal raises?In rapidly evolving fields like technology, what timeline in the exact same title often raises questions for hiring managers?What tangible downside is associated with staying put on a single, slow-moving pay trajectory for many years?What distinguishes a positive narrative of a ten-year tenure from a potentially negative one?What is the primary argument against staying in one place for too long regarding skill development?What strategy involves identifying a key skill gap your current company faces and aggressively training to become the internal expert?What quality, often gained over a long tenure, is highly valued by employers and helps navigate complexity that newcomers cannot?What is suggested as a common yardstick for assessing if one's progression rate is adequate?According to career commentators, what constitutes a 'weak' story when narrating one's career longevity?