What is recommended for review processes following a privacy misstep or bias discovery, involving non-technical staff?
Answer
Implementing 'Trust Incident Post-Mortems' rather than traditional security-only analyses.
It is actionable to implement Trust Incident Post-Mortems that explicitly include non-technical stakeholders to assign accountability for the break in the trust relationship and prescribe cultural or process changes.
Related Questions
What is the core definition of Digital Trust held by stakeholders?Which of the following is listed as an overarching Guiding Goal of a digital trust structure?What measurable dimension specifically aims to prevent emotional, physical, or psychological harm resulting from technology use?Which operational pillar forms the structural bedrock of the trust strategy and includes appointing a Chief Trust Officer equivalent?What must be ensured regarding data to establish a foundational element of trust?When integrating new technology, what common tension must organizations manage?What is the initial phase of operationalizing a framework called, according to the World Economic Forum roadmap?What mechanism is identified as critical for logically breaking down high-level goals into measurable engineering requirements?What must product development foresight systematically involve when focusing on content- and conduct-related risk?What is recommended for review processes following a privacy misstep or bias discovery, involving non-technical staff?