What do regulators primarily look for as evidence of a mature compliance process, rather than demanding absolute perfection?
Answer
Evidence of a mature process designed to catch and correct errors promptly
Regulators do not expect a process to be flawless or perfect; instead, they require tangible evidence that the process in place is mature enough that it can swiftly identify and correct any errors or lapses that occur.
Related Questions
What are the severe consequences associated with failure in fintech compliance?What core obligations are frequently central to compliance work for US fintech companies?In the initial requirement mapping phase, which category encompasses KYC/AML programs and SAR processes?What is identified as the foundation of the compliance program roadmap?When dealing with new product features, what essential documentation step should precede going live?In the context of compliance monitoring, what does ongoing testing verify about a control?What common pitfall threatens fast-growing fintechs regarding their monitoring capability?How does the compliance team's role shift when a culture of compliance is successfully integrated?In a typical bank-fintech partnership arrangement, which entity generally holds the ultimate responsibility to regulators for the fintech’s activities?What do regulators primarily look for as evidence of a mature compliance process, rather than demanding absolute perfection?