What consequence might arise if an auditor has deep data science knowledge but lacks grounding in employment law?
Answer
They might correctly identify a statistical disparity but miss the underlying legal mechanism that makes it actionable or illegal.
The text notes that an auditor strong in data science but lacking legal context might correctly identify a statistical disparity but fail to grasp the underlying legal mechanism that makes that disparity actionable or illegal.
Related Questions
What is cited as the primary job title surfacing in the emerging field of automated decision-making system examination?What technical expertise does the Algorithm Bias Auditor primarily focus on identifying and measuring?How does algorithm auditing fundamentally differ from traditional software testing according to the text?Which specialized role concentrates primarily on purely technical performance metrics like predictive accuracy and robustness before fairness review?What is the main responsibility of the Algorithmic Governance Specialist concerning audits?What professional type is the true Technical Auditor functionally closer to, given the required skillset?Which role is described as acting as the liaison between technical auditors and the executive suite or legal counsel?What crucial skill is identified as the most valuable asset for success in algorithm auditing, regardless of title?During which phase of the audit process is the AI Policy Analyst often taking the lead by defining scope?What consequence might arise if an auditor has deep data science knowledge but lacks grounding in employment law?