What condition confirms that a culture has sidelined meritocracy regarding career advancement?
Answer
Advancement criteria seem vague, inconsistent, or tied to personal relationships
When the path to promotion lacks clear, demonstrable results as the primary criteria, and instead relies on inconsistent standards or personal connections, it indicates that meritocracy has been abandoned.
Related Questions
In toxic settings, what role do managers often adopt instead of acting as buffers and coaches?What common management behavior signals a deep-seated lack of trust?How does communication function in a toxic setting compared to a healthy one?If important decisions are announced via email at 4:55 PM on a Friday, what does this behavior suggest about leadership?What is cited as one of the most objective indicators of a consistently toxic work environment?When leadership bad-mouths employees after they have already departed, what protective measure are they likely taking?What condition confirms that a culture has sidelined meritocracy regarding career advancement?During an interview, what suggests an interviewer's answer about what they like least about the job is rooted in toxicity?What does the cultural glorification of working through weekends or taking working vacations signify?If potential peers respond vaguely, like saying 'It varies,' when asked about their typical work schedule, what does this vagueness often translate to?If leaving a toxic environment is not immediately feasible, what is the stated long-term goal for survival?