In AI Governance, what specific legal mechanism is required to make developers anticipate risks from the outset?
Answer
Institutionalizing a duty of care
A duty of care must be established, placing the obligation on AI developers to anticipate and design against risks before harm occurs, ensuring clear legal accountability.
Related Questions
What is the fundamental goal of building a career in humane technology?Which core tenet requires technology to work with, rather than exploit, evolved human vulnerabilities?What concept, often associated with older Silicon Valley culture, does humane technology actively seek to move away from?In AI Governance, what specific legal mechanism is required to make developers anticipate risks from the outset?According to the principles, what should ultimately guide product development metrics?What is the goal of the tenet 'Help People Thrive'?What tier of career opportunity involves humane technology being the *primary function* of the role?What internal shift is required for sustained success in this field, contrasting with the old culture?What is one recommended resource for demonstrating foundational knowledge in humane technology?What intervention in AI Governance involves resisting the urge to blur the line between human and machine entities?