When structuring the reply, what percentage of the time should ideally be spent describing corrective steps?
Answer
About 70-80%
The majority of the allotted time should be used to detail the corrective actions and demonstrate accountability, keeping the initial identification brief.
Related Questions
What is the primary goal when answering the biggest weakness question?What might an interviewer infer if a candidate claims to have absolutely no weaknesses?Which type of weakness presents the greatest risk by suggesting a poor job fit?What kind of weakness is considered truly effective for discussion?How does framing a weakness as an unmastered skill change the interview dynamic?Which step in the four-part answer sequence requires detailing specific, measurable steps taken to address the area?When structuring the reply, what percentage of the time should ideally be spent describing corrective steps?What does a noticeable hesitation when discussing a weakness imply to the interviewer?What does a strong answer often highlight regarding remediation efforts?Which scenario represents presenting a weakness that is central to the job function?