When managing two full-time remote roles, how do employers often interpret an employee dedicating core business hours to the second role?
Answer
As deceptive, irrespective of task completion.
If an employer expects dedication during contracted core hours for a full-time role, dedicating that time to another full-time role is frequently viewed negatively, even if performance metrics appear to be met.
Related Questions
What generally makes holding two separate jobs concurrently acceptable from a legal standpoint for most general employees?What is the most significant hurdle typically encountered when taking on dual employment?What specific clause restricts an employee from working for a direct competitor for a set duration after leaving a job?What is often the quickest route an employer uses for termination when they discover dual employment they disapprove of?What does the concept of 'duty of loyalty' imply for an employee during working hours?What action concerning resources constitutes a significant breach potentially leading to serious consequences beyond simple termination?When managing two full-time remote roles, how do employers often interpret an employee dedicating core business hours to the second role?What is a major financial pitfall for individuals holding two W-2 jobs if they do not manage administrative tasks correctly?How does the autonomy concerning time management generally differ if Job B is structured as a 1099 independent contractor role versus a second W-2 role?What is the general advice regarding disclosure of a second job if no contract explicitly requires it?