What distinction exists between a job listed as 'Remote, Los Angeles, CA' and one listed as 'Remote, United States' concerning geographical flexibility?

The difference can be the distinction between being tied to a specific state's tax jurisdiction versus having true geographical flexibility.

The text draws a crucial distinction between geo-restricted remote listings and truly location-agnostic ones by citing the difference between 'Remote, Los Angeles, CA' and 'Remote, United States'. When a role is tied to a specific high-cost-of-living area like Los Angeles, it might still impose residency limitations due to local regulations, tax reasons, or regional compliance needs. If an employee must reside in California, they fall under that state's tax jurisdiction. Conversely, roles advertised as 'Remote, United States' or similar generally offer freedom of movement across the nation without immediate state residency constraints, providing genuine geographical flexibility for the job seeker seeking absolute movement freedom.