What secondary action is suggested to dramatically increase the relevance of curriculum by bridging industry and academia?
Answer
Requiring faculty to periodically consult or work within the relevant industry
An insight suggests that requiring faculty to spend periodic time consulting or working within the relevant industry increases curriculum relevance by ensuring what is taught directly addresses current market deficiencies.
Related Questions
What generally dictates the financial reward structure in most economies?How is higher educational attainment correlated with employment stability?What are the generalized competencies highly valued by employers, often resulting from rigorous academic programs?What specific lack do many employers report in new hires despite possessing necessary academic qualifications?Compared to someone with only a high school diploma, what is true about individuals with a bachelor's degree regarding career income?What frequently acts as a gatekeeper for senior management and leadership positions?What do higher rates of labor force participation signify regarding educated individuals?What mental resilience quality developed through higher education translates directly into professional tenacity?What secondary action is suggested to dramatically increase the relevance of curriculum by bridging industry and academia?When planning careers, what comparison regarding investment payback period is considered crucial?Besides credentialing, what is a college education often touted for teaching students regarding adapting to evolving job requirements?What mental reframing is suggested as an actionable step for students to bridge the practical application gap?