What dual functions of performance reviews often lead to friction?
Answer
Record-keeping for compensation decisions and acting as a checkpoint for growth
Performance reviews serve the administrative function of record-keeping necessary for justifying salary decisions or bonuses, and the developmental function of offering a structured opportunity to discuss achievements and improvement areas. When one purpose heavily outweighs the other, friction can occur.
Related Questions
What dual functions of performance reviews often lead to friction?Which type of feedback is cited as being more effective at driving career progression?How should an employee treat the self-assessment portion of the review?What can a mediocre or mixed review often cause in cultures reliant on documented performance data?What issue do annual check-ins frequently suffer from due to the time lag?Which strategy is suggested for modernized performance management systems?What is a direct benefit of an employee being reviewed quarterly instead of annually?What is the intended purpose of the calibration process following individual reviews?Why is disciplined self-documentation essential for an employee's long-term career health?How does the text ultimately describe performance reviews in relation to management culture?