review articles
What dual functions of performance reviews often lead to friction?
Which type of feedback is cited as being more effective at driving career progression?
How should an employee treat the self-assessment portion of the review?
What can a mediocre or mixed review often cause in cultures reliant on documented performance data?
What issue do annual check-ins frequently suffer from due to the time lag?
Which strategy is suggested for modernized performance management systems?
What is a direct benefit of an employee being reviewed quarterly instead of annually?
What is the intended purpose of the calibration process following individual reviews?
Why is disciplined self-documentation essential for an employee's long-term career health?
How does the text ultimately describe performance reviews in relation to management culture?
Is a dedicated career built solely on peer review currently financially viable?
Which OPR model involves making reviewer critiques public without revealing the authors of those critiques?
How is engagement with OPR primarily viewed for early-career scientists (ECRs)?
What is the core value proposition of OPR for a researcher's career visibility?
What is the general status regarding financial compensation for peer reviewers in most academic journals?
What potential negative effect might attached reviewer identities have on the quality of criticism?
Toward which types of roles can expertise gained in OPR serve as a fast-track toward standard compensation?
What is suggested as a more impactful CV framing for published open reviews rather than simply listing the service?
How should OPR participation currently be best understood in relation to one's primary academic profession?