What distinguishes Diagonal Movement from simple Lateral Movement on the career lattice?
Answer
It involves shifting to a role slightly up or down in hierarchy into an entirely new domain critical for senior roles
Diagonal progression is nuanced, involving a change in hierarchy level (up or down) while simultaneously introducing the employee to a new functional domain crucial for later, higher-level achievements.
Related Questions
What directions of movement does the career lattice explicitly encourage for employee growth?What type of career progression involves shifting to a role at a similar level of responsibility but within a different function or department?What is a common consequence for employees desiring a change of focus under a strictly defined career ladder system?What crucial characteristic must a lateral or diagonal move possess for the career lattice to function effectively as a development tool?What immediate organizational benefit is gained by adopting the career lattice structure?What type of employee is being developed through lateral moves intended to build cross-departmental knowledge?When mapping roles for the career lattice, what basis should this mapping primarily use rather than just reporting structure?What distinguishes Diagonal Movement from simple Lateral Movement on the career lattice?What forms the foundation for defining the steps when building a career lattice structure?How must managers evolve their role when the organization adopts the career lattice framework?If lateral moves within the lattice are culturally perceived as a sign of failure or demotion, what is the structural result?