What analytical tip is provided for comparing success rates across different funding mechanisms or years?
Answer
Normalize success rates by the known risk profile associated with the funding mechanism.
To avoid drawing misleading conclusions when comparing success rates for different award types, it is important to account for the inherent risk level or novelty expected by the funding mechanism before making cross-institute or cross-year comparisons.
Related Questions
What is the primary strategic goal of applying data science methods in science funding analytics?What is the key distinction in data analysis intent between a funding agency and a university?What does analyzing historical success comparing R01 grants versus R21 grants demand beyond simple dollar amount comparison?According to the comparison table, what is a key metric analyzed by funders for Strategic Portfolio Management?How might a funding organization utilize Artificial Intelligence in managing its portfolio?When analyzing historical data to predict grant submission success, what must an applicant investigate beyond merely reading the Request for Applications (RFA)?What analytical tip is provided for comparing success rates across different funding mechanisms or years?Which combination of tools is typically employed by professionals modeling grant success?Why is expertise in data provenance crucial when integrating data from various sources in science funding analytics?Beyond general data science skills, what specialized capability is necessary for an analyst in this domain?