Under federal law, if an employer *chooses* to offer a genuine meal period of 30 minutes or more, what is the compensation requirement?
Answer
It does not need to be compensated if the employee is completely relieved from duty
Federal law specifies that genuine meal periods lasting 30 minutes or longer, during which the employee is entirely relieved from their work duties, are not required to be compensated by the employer.
Related Questions
What requirement does the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) set for employers regarding providing meal periods?Under federal law, if an employer *chooses* to offer a genuine meal period of 30 minutes or more, what is the compensation requirement?What must happen if an employer offers short rest breaks, typically between five and twenty minutes?What is the key determinant for how lunch breaks are treated, regardless of salary status?What is true regarding a salaried, non-exempt employee who works through their scheduled lunch break?What is the state requirement concerning meal breaks for adult employees in Arizona?If an employee performing salaried duties is required to remain at their desk to answer phones during lunch in a state with stringent break requirements, how should that time legally be counted?What action legally occurs if an employee's scheduled unpaid lunch break is interrupted by a required meeting or checking emails?When calculating the effective hourly rate for a salaried employee who takes a 60-minute unpaid lunch daily, what happens to the effective rate compared to taking a 30-minute unpaid lunch?What is considered the most direct path for an employee to gain clarity on whether their lunch is covered for payment?