In the comparison between two engineers working 60 hours weekly, which factor makes Engineer B more susceptible to negative health effects?
Answer
Being micro-managed and having breaks dictated by an external manager.
Engineer B suffers more because the lack of control, manifesting as micro-management and inability to deflect demands, creates anticipatory stress that taxes the body more severely than the sheer volume of work.
Related Questions
What is the primary concern regarding the impact of long work hours and stress?Which factor significantly exacerbates the health risks associated with high job demands?How do high-strain work environments interact with longevity gains from medical science?From a biological risk assessment standpoint, what does low control transform necessary effort into?What is the consequence if the current paradigm of high-demand, low-control employment continues while careers are expected to last longer?In the comparison between two engineers working 60 hours weekly, which factor makes Engineer B more susceptible to negative health effects?What must the focus shift toward if the goal is a long and healthy career, rather than output maximization?When evaluating a career path, what must be assessed alongside salary and promotions, considering health implications?What is a practical step mentioned to address the 'control deficit' in an unbalanced job?If the current trend continues without structural change, what is likely to happen to the 'effective working lifespan'?