What is the stated consequence of submitting a poorly written or generic cover letter?
Answer
It is actively worse than sending nothing at all
A cover letter that is generic or poorly executed signals carelessness or a lack of genuine interest, making it a liability that is actively detrimental compared to submitting no letter at all.
Related Questions
On what factors does the necessity of including a cover letter heavily depend?What negative signal might sending a cover letter send if the job posting explicitly stated not to include one?While a resume excels at detailing achievements, what specific question does the cover letter uniquely address in the application package?In which job application scenario is skipping the cover letter considered a significant tactical error?For which type of position is a strong cover letter often viewed as demonstrating an intrinsic part of the job function itself?What do recruiters primarily look for during the initial high-speed screen of applications?After passing the initial high-speed screen, which reader uses the cover letter to assess narrative connection and problem-solving ability?What is the stated consequence of submitting a poorly written or generic cover letter?What does matching the tone of the job description (e.g., casual for a startup) demonstrate about the applicant?When applying the 'So What?' test to a potential cover letter point, what should the revised statement focus on?Which situation requires the cover letter to serve as a crucial explanatory bridge for the resume?