What function do critics suggest licensing sometimes serves other than public safety?
Answer
A barrier to entry for new competitors
Critics argue that when applied to low-risk occupations, licensing requirements can function more as a barrier to entry for new competitors than as a genuine safeguard for the public, sometimes relating to professional protectionism.
Related Questions
Approximately what percentage of the American workforce requires an occupational license to practice their profession?Beyond fields like medicine and law, where else does the requirement for an occupational license extend?What is the primary stated reason given for implementing occupational licensing?What function do critics suggest licensing sometimes serves other than public safety?Which demographic group is research indicated to be significantly limited in job access by occupational licensing?What financial impact can licensing hurdles create for low-wage workers seeking entry into a trade?At what level of government is occupational licensing overwhelmingly controlled in the United States?What difficulty often arises for a professional moving across state lines regarding their credentials?What is a practical tip suggested for workers attempting to move between states requiring occupational licenses?According to one measure from 2016, what percentage of civilian jobs involved some requirement for driving as part of the daily duties?