What does hesitation or inability to describe a recent, non-externally reported near-miss suggest about an organization claiming HRO status?
Answer
That they prioritize external reporting over internal learning.
When organizations focus on events requiring external reporting rather than minor, internal near-misses, it indicates they view errors as compliance issues rather than opportunities for immediate, free system learning.
Related Questions
How do High-Reliability Organizations fundamentally differ from many organizations in their treatment of errors?What mindset does the mandatory reluctance to simplify complex issues in an HRO foster?How does working in an HRO structure specifically benefit healthcare professionals regarding moral distress?What leadership style is emphasized for leaders managing an HRO, moving away from traditional models?How is success typically treated within the HRO culture characterized by a preoccupation with failure?Which skill is described as the key to long-term viability in an HRO, beyond mere technical competence?What temporary instability do new employees often face when joining an HRO after working in traditional settings?In critical decision moments within an HRO, whose weight carries more influence: formal title or actual knowledge?What does hesitation or inability to describe a recent, non-externally reported near-miss suggest about an organization claiming HRO status?True long-term viability in an HRO culture is found in staff exhibiting commitment rather than what?As artificial intelligence and automation increase, how is the human role expected to shift in relation to HRO skills?