If using a subjective scale of one to ten for stress/engagement, when does the energy required for change become less damaging than staying put?
Answer
When that score consistently registers above a six or seven
If the subjective 'cost of inaction' score, based on stress levels and engagement, consistently scores above a six or seven, the energy needed to initiate a change is often less damaging than remaining in the unsuitable environment.
Related Questions
Beyond mere boredom, what typically causes the desire for a professional pivot?What is cited as a significant internal signal that a current role is negatively impacting life quality?If using a subjective scale of one to ten for stress/engagement, when does the energy required for change become less damaging than staying put?What is the productive view of existing expertise during a career change, rather than erasing the past?What transferable competencies might a construction project manager possess that are valued in software implementation?What is the initial phase required to demystify the process of moving into an entirely new role?What specific, actionable step helps rigorously test assumptions about a potential new career?What assets gathered over years often outweigh a lack of initial technical knowledge for older career changers?Which type of pivot is suggested to require 12 to 18 months of dedicated upskilling?What is the common strategy successful career changers use to communicate their past experience effectively?