How might high performers be punished in settings exhibiting the 'Performance Paradox'?
Answer
By being given significantly more work without commensurate reward or support.
In some toxic settings, high performers are punished by being overloaded with significantly more work because they are reliable, often without corresponding rewards or support.
Related Questions
What defines the pervasive atmosphere of a toxic workplace?Which leadership failure involves management speaking dismissively to employees?In terms of communication, what negative outcome results from an environment rife with gossip?What is noted as a critical signal related to employee well-being that suggests the environment is driving people out?What key element distinguishes a legally defined 'hostile work environment' from a general 'toxic work environment'?What aspect of financial cost from toxicity is harder to quantify than hiring expenses?How might high performers be punished in settings exhibiting the 'Performance Paradox'?What must be done with documentation of unprofessional behavior for self-preservation?What does pervasive micromanagement signal to competent employees regarding their capabilities?What constitutes excessive 'emotional labor' in a toxic environment?