How does the typical skill time allocation differ between a dedicated Machine Vision Engineer and an Automation Engineer integrating that system?
Answer
The Automation Engineer allocates a much higher percentage to PLC/network communication programming (e.g., 70%) than the Vision Engineer (e.g., 40% on optics).
A dedicated Vision Engineer might focus heavily on software (60%) and optics (40%), whereas the integrating Automation Engineer shifts focus heavily toward ensuring correct data flow and safety interlocks via PLC and network programming (70%).
Related Questions
What are the primary implementation tasks assigned to a Vision Systems Engineer?What additional expertise must an Automation Machine Vision Engineer possess beyond vision software knowledge?What defines the focus of newer roles incorporating 'Computer Vision' or 'AI Jobs' in this field?How does the focus shift for a mid-career professional moving into a Staff Engineer position?What is the central responsibility distinguishing directorial management roles in vision systems?What specialized function is typically assigned to Vision System Technicians or Field Service Engineers?How does the typical skill time allocation differ between a dedicated Machine Vision Engineer and an Automation Engineer integrating that system?Roles specializing in classic computer vision principles spend significant time optimizing which physical and mathematical elements?Why do Robotics Engineers frequently intersect with machine vision roles in industrial settings?What applications related to automated quality control are mentioned as relying on machine vision according to Keyence?