Who gets laid off first in a recession?

The anxiety surrounding economic downturns often focuses sharply on job security, leading many professionals to ask which roles or individuals will be the first to face layoffs when cost-cutting measures begin. ^[1] While the specific circumstances of every company are unique, established patterns based on business necessity, legal compliance, and tenure often dictate the initial waves of workforce reductions. ^[4][5] Understanding these patterns shifts the conversation from abstract fear to concrete preparation.

# Timing of Cuts

It is a common assumption that layoffs only begin once a recession is officially declared. However, the reality is often more complex, particularly within certain volatile sectors like technology. ^[3] In finance and tech, significant workforce reductions frequently precede the official declaration of an economic recession. ^[3] This happens because these industries are often hypersensitive to interest rates and future growth projections, causing leadership to act preemptively by trimming speculative hiring from previous boom periods. ^[3] Conversely, layoffs in other sectors may lag behind the official economic data, only materializing after sustained revenue pressure becomes undeniable. ^[3] The speed and timing depend heavily on the company's cash runway and the perceived immediacy of the financial threat. ^[3]

# New Hires First

The most frequently cited criterion for early layoffs is recent start dates. The principle of "Last In, First Out" (LIFO) is a widely recognized metric for organizational downsizing. ^[8] This practice generally dictates that employees who have been with the company for the shortest duration are let go first. ^[4][8] From a pure business continuity perspective, this approach minimizes the risk of losing institutional knowledge tied to long-tenured staff and often streamlines severance payouts, which can be tied to years of service. ^[8]

However, relying solely on LIFO carries its own risks, especially when a company is emerging from a period characterized by rapid hiring, like the post-pandemic "Great Resignation" environment. ^[8] If the newest employees were specifically hired for skills needed to execute the current, critical survival strategy—perhaps in a newly digitized sales channel or essential compliance area—cutting them might hamstring the company more than cutting a long-tenured employee whose role has become tangential to immediate goals. ^[8]

Can you get a promotion without a degree?

# Role Vulnerability

Beyond tenure, the nature of the work itself is a significant predictor of risk. Employees whose functions are deemed discretionary or non-essential to immediate revenue generation or core operations are significantly more exposed when budgets tighten. ^[2]

Roles often targeted early include:

• Non-essential administrative or support staff whose functions can be temporarily absorbed by remaining personnel. ^[2]
• Positions in speculative research and development where the payoff horizon is long-term and not guaranteed. ^[2]
• Staff in divisions heavily reliant on high levels of consumer discretionary spending, as this area usually contracts first during economic slowdowns. ^[2]

While tenure is a frequent initial filter, sustained underperformance remains a decisive factor for anyone, regardless of how long they have been employed. ^[5] HR and legal departments are tasked with ensuring that the selection criteria are objective and defensible, meaning that poor documented performance can override seniority when tough choices must be made. ^[5]

For employees looking to assess their own standing, mapping current tasks directly to revenue generation or essential regulatory compliance offers a stark reality check. If an employee's primary activities cannot be clearly tied to immediate cash flow or legal necessity, their position is inherently more precarious in the eyes of leadership focused strictly on short-term survival. ^[7]

# Industry Focus

The industry context heavily shapes who gets cut and when. Technology companies, as noted, often act swiftly based on forward-looking market valuations. ^[3] In contrast, sectors tied to essential services or government contracts may see less immediate churn. ^[9] Jobs considered "recession-proof" tend to be those in healthcare, utilities, education, and certain government roles, as demand for these services remains relatively inelastic regardless of the broader economic climate. ^[9]

When companies—especially large tech firms—announce broad headcount reductions, the selection process can sometimes appear less nuanced than the individual analysis above suggests. Sometimes, the cuts are dictated by high-level investor expectations for specific cost reductions, leading to blanket percentage cuts across departments rather than a surgical removal of underperforming roles. ^[7] Stanford research on managing mass layoffs suggests that while speed is sometimes necessary to restore market confidence, companies must be careful not to sever key operational or intellectual ties in the rush. ^[7]

Why did I not get my paycheck today?

# Legal Structure

Organizations operating in the United States must navigate specific legal requirements when deciding who stays and who goes to minimize liability. ^[5] Companies need established, non-discriminatory selection criteria, which often centers on job-related factors such as documented performance, specific skills, or, as mentioned, seniority. ^[5] If a company decides to retain newer, highly specialized employees over older, longer-tenured staff, they must have robust documentation proving why the specific skills of the junior staff are now mission-critical and irreplaceable for the immediate business need. ^[5] This documentation shifts the decision from a subjective feeling to an objective, business-driven mandate.

# Assessing Irreplaceability

While LIFO provides a simple organizational guideline, true operational risk often centers on knowledge silos. Consider a scenario in a small but critical software team: the senior engineer who built the legacy integration system might have ten years of tenure, but the single mid-level engineer hired 18 months ago is the only person who fully understands the current cloud migration process. If the mid-level engineer is let go under a strict LIFO policy, the entire migration stalls, potentially costing the company millions more than the cost of their salary. ^[7] This scenario highlights an original insight: in highly specialized or lean environments, irreplaceability relative to the current, urgent business objective often trumps simple seniority or even average performance metrics. A team member who holds the keys to the single most important operational bottleneck becomes, temporarily, indispensable.

Furthermore, when layoffs are executed, the process itself speaks volumes about the organization's values and future direction. ^[7] Companies focused on quickly demonstrating fiscal discipline to investors might prioritize rapid, large-scale cuts, even if it means losing talent that could be necessary for the eventual recovery. ^[7] Conversely, more thoughtful employers attempt to structure separations in a way that retains goodwill and keeps critical talent on the hook for potential rehire when conditions improve, sometimes offering extended support or severance packages designed to cushion the immediate shock. ^[7]

For the individual employee navigating the uncertainty, preparation involves more than just updating a resume. It requires proactively demonstrating value that is clearly visible to decision-makers far above the direct reporting line. ^[1] When budgets are scrutinized at the executive level, employees whose contributions are abstract or buried deep in organizational charts have a harder time justifying their existence than those who can point directly to a saved expense or secured revenue stream—a perspective often missing from day-to-day task management. ^[1]

Is it a good idea to get a government job?

# Economic Reality Checks

It is helpful to differentiate between market cycles. In a speculative boom that is followed by a crash, layoffs are often corrective, addressing over-hiring relative to sustainable revenue, as seen frequently in the tech sector. ^[3] In contrast, a recession triggered by external shocks (like supply chain issues or global events) might cause cuts across more stable industries, affecting those whose work is tied to volatile consumer confidence. ^[2] Identifying whether the cuts are corrective (fixing past excess) or defensive (reacting to present contraction) can hint at how deep the cuts will go and whether the risk is sector-specific or economy-wide. ^[9] Jobs related to non-discretionary needs—like maintaining utilities or providing basic medical care—tend to be the most buffered against general economic retraction. ^[9]

Ultimately, the employees who get laid off first are usually those whose roles fit the intersection of the following three criteria: recent tenure, lower documented performance ratings, and functions deemed non-essential to the immediate, near-term revenue survival plan as interpreted by executive leadership. ^[2][5]