Regarding long-term career flexibility, what is often advised about sitting for the bar exam, even when pursuing non-practicing roles?
Answer
It is often an advisable investment as it increases long-term marketability
If one intends to practice eventually, sitting for the bar exam when possible is often advisable because licensure increases long-term marketability and retains the option to practice later.
Related Questions
Which method of professional regulation is generally the most stringent?What documentation confirms an attorney's status in New York state, distinguishing it from a standard pocket-sized license?What activity defines the core function that bar examinations and subsequent licensing are designed to guard?Which sector is highlighted as a prevalent JD advantage role where a license is often not strictly required?What is the stated primary driver for the existence of professional licensing in law-related fields?What is an example of a state-level program authorizing trained non-lawyer advocates to provide specific, limited advocacy services?What core asset does a Juris Doctor (JD) degree provide that is valuable across many industries outside the courtroom?In government and policy roles, what specific regulatory oversight responsibility might a JD holder perform?Why are individuals with JD training suited for Legal Technology and E-Discovery roles?Regarding long-term career flexibility, what is often advised about sitting for the bar exam, even when pursuing non-practicing roles?